Jason Statham has long been the go-to action star for fans who crave gritty, no-nonsense storytelling. From The Transporter to Wrath of Man , he’s built a career on playing tough, working-class heroes with a knack for violence and charm in equal measure. So when his latest film, A Working Man , underperformed compared to last year’s hit The Beekeeper , it left many scratching their heads.

Both films were directed by David Ayer, starred Statham as a man trying to leave his violent past behind, and shared similar budgets — around $40 million. But while The Beekeeper raked in over $162 million worldwide, A Working Man only managed $99.1 million. That’s not a failure, but it was clearly below expectations — especially given Statham’s track record.

---

The Numbers Don’t Lie

Statham has proven time and again that he can deliver solid returns, even in smaller packages. Take Wrath of Man , which opened during the height of the pandemic and still earned $104 million on a $40 million budget. Or Mechanic: Resurrection , which grossed $125.8 million globally. These aren’t blockbusters in the Marvel or Fast & Furious sense, but they’re dependable hits in their own right.

A Working Man followed a similar blueprint — a modest budget, a familiar setup, and a strong lead performance from Statham. Yet it didn’t quite click with audiences the way The Beekeeper did. Critics weren’t kind either, giving it a 48% score on Rotten Tomatoes versus 71% for its predecessor. While audience scores stayed high (87%), the lukewarm critical reception likely hurt word-of-mouth and box office momentum.

---

Why Did It Miss?

There are a few possible reasons. For one, The Beekeeper had a unique hook — an aging assassin cleaning out the government one target at a time. It felt fresh and timely. A Working Man leaned into a more familiar formula, which may have made it feel less urgent. Plus, with so many action stars flooding the market these days, standing out is harder than ever.

Still, the movie wasn’t a disaster. And with such a modest budget, it’s hard to call it a major misfire. In fact, it fits right into the pattern we’ve seen with Statham’s recent projects — reliable, if not explosive, returns.

---

What’s Next for Levon Cade?

Despite the box office dip, A Working Man isn’t without potential. The character of Levon Cade is compelling, and with a little more depth and development, could become a franchise in his own right. Think of how John Wick started — a small, focused story that grew into a massive cinematic universe.

And there are signs that Amazon MGM is already thinking about that future. Rumors suggest that a Beekeeper 2 is in the works, and if that project goes well, it might open the door for more standalone Statham-led adventures like A Working Man . With the right direction and some creative tweaks, this could be the start of another profitable series.

---

Statham Remains a Box Office Staple

At the end of the day, Jason Statham is still one of the most bankable names in action cinema. He doesn’t need big budgets or CGI spectacles to draw crowds. He needs a good script, a tight story, and a chance to play a man who gets the job done — quietly, efficiently, and with a hint of dry humor.

So while A Working Man may not have reached the heights of The Beekeeper , it’s far from the end of the line. If anything, it shows that Statham’s best work is still ahead — as long as studios keep betting on what makes him special.

Also read:

• Ballerina: Why the John Wick Spinoff Shows the Franchise’s Biggest Risk
• “Leverage: Redemption Season 3: Jeri Ryan on Tara Cole’s Return”
• Lionsgate Dropped Highlander Because The Director Wanted Too Much Money (And Amazon Said “Hold My Beer”)